Distant regions underpin interregional flows of cultural ecosystem services provided by birds and mammals

Journal article


Publication Details


Author list: Schröter M., Kraemer R., Remme R.P., van Oudenhoven A.P.E.

Journal: AMBIO: A Journal of the Human Environment

Publication year: 2020

Volume number: 49

Issue number: 5

Pages: 1100-1113

Publisher: Springer Verlag (Germany)

ISSN: 0044-7447

eISSN: 1654-7209

DOI: 10.1007/s13280-019-01261-3

URL: https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85073960605&origin=inward

Languages: English-Great Britain


Abstract


Ecosystem service assessments rarely consider flows between distant regions. Hence, telecoupling effects such as conservation burdens in distant ecosystems are ignored. We identified service-providing species for two cultural ecosystem services (existence and bequest, and birdwatching) and two receiving, i.e. benefitting, regions (Germany, the Netherlands). We delineated and analysed sending, i.e. service-providing, regions on a global scale. The proportion of service-providing species with distant habitats was higher for birdwatching (Germany: 58.6%, Netherlands: 59.4%), than for existence and bequest (Germany: 49.3%, Netherlands: 57.1%). Hotspots of sending regions were predominantly situated in tropical and subtropical grasslands, savannas and shrublands and were significantly more threatened and poorer than the global mean. Hotspot protection levels for flows to Germany were higher than the global mean, and lower for the Dutch hotspots. Our findings increase understanding on how distant regions underpin ecosystem services and necessitate interregional assessment as well as conservation efforts.


Last updated on 2020-15-07 at 00:45