Principles of the Deliberative Ought


Practical reasoning aims to answer the question “What ought I to do?”. This research project is concerned with the concept of ‘ought’ that figures in this core question of practical deliberation and may thus be called the deliberative ought. The goal of the project is to systematically examine fundamental principles of the deliberative ought and their philosophical implications, where a principle is assumed to be fundamental if its claim to validity does not depend on any substantive normative theory. Fundamental principles of the deliberative ought include e.g. principles that correspond to the laws of deontic logic and the so-called instrumental transmission principles.


Principal Investigators
Kiesewetter, Benjamin Dr. (Details) (Philosophy in Practice / Ethics)

Duration of Project
Start date: 06/2015
End date: 06/2020

Research Areas
Philosophy, Practical Philosophy, Theoretical Philosophy

Publications
1. Kiesewetter, Benjamin und Jan Gertken: “How Do Reasons Transmit to Non-Nececessary Means?”, forthcoming in: Australasian Journal of Philosophy (2020). URL = https://doi.org/10.1080/00048402.2020.1745252.
2. Kiesewetter, Benjamin: “Rationality as Reasons-Responsiveness”, forthcoming in: Australasian Philosophical Review (2020).
3. Kiesewetter, Benjamin: “Can the Lottery Paradox be Solved by Identifying Epistemic Justification with Epistemic Permissibility?”, Episteme 16 (3), 241–261 (2019).
4. Kiesewetter, Benjamin: Review of Ralph Wedgwood’s The Value of Rationality, Ethics 129(3): 501–8 (2019).
5. Kiesewetter, Benjamin: “How Reasons Are Sensitive to Available Evidence”, in Normativity: Epistemic and Practical, ed. Conor McHugh, Daniel Whiting and Jonathan Way, 90–114, Oxford: Oxford University Press (2018).
6. Kiesewetter, Benjamin: “Normative und motivierende Gründe: Ein Kommentar zu Susanne Mantels Determined by Reasons”, Zeitschrift für philosophische Forschung 72 (3): 421–8 (2018).
7. Kiesewetter, Benjamin: “Contrary-to-Duty Scenarios, Deontic Dilemmas, and Transmission Principles”, Ethics 129 (1): 98–115 (2018).
8. Kiesewetter, Benjamin: “What Kind of Perspectivism?”, Journal of Moral Philosophy 15 (4): 415–43 (2018).
9. Gertken, Jan und Benjamin Kiesewetter: “The Right and the Wrong Kind of Reasons”, Philosophy Compass 12 (5), 1–14 (2017).
10. Kiesewetter, Benjamin: “You Ought to Φ Only If You May Believe that You Ought to Φ”, The Philosophical Quarterly 66 (265), 760–82 (2016).

Last updated on 2020-11-05 at 15:01